Skip to main content

What would Dan Brown make of Graham Sutherland's Tapestry?

A Musing by Paul Maddock's, Vice Chairman of the Coventry Society

I have always wondered what type of story Dan Brown could write about the mysteries of Graham Sutherland's Coventry Cathedral's Tapestry. In Dan Brown's 'The Da Vinci Code' he looks very hard into the symbolism of the 'Last Supper' by Leonardo Da Vinci, one of the most widely read novels of all time. I am not saying that the Coventry Cathedral's Tapestry has a historic secret to hide but what was Graham Sutherland trying to say to us in the future? I have always felt that the tapestry is more of a 'mood board' of the art and artists of the 1950s. The subject is a common one, 'Christ in Glory'. This has been done very many times throughout history, the last judgement, the resurrection of Christ, from the last book in the Bible. So Graham was working within very limited confines of the brief - it has to have Christ seated, with representations of St. Matthew. St. Mark, St. Luke and St. John surrounding him. He also added to this is an image of St. Michael, after the name of the Cathedral. What is interesting about this image is the fact that it is taken from a photographs by Eadweard Muybridge. Francis Bacon, a good friend of Graham, was using these images in his paintings, so was he giving a nod to his friend in this '1950s Mood Board'? The yellow lines on Sutherland's tapestry that make a invisible room shape are very much like the invisible room shapes in paintings by Bacon.

Francis Bacon Images

Graham Sutherland was a skilled illustrator. He had taught art, etching, engraving and book illustration and you can see that he can draw if you look at the face of Christ in the tapestry. But if you look at St. Matthew to the left, top of the tapestry, its very Picasso like and under that is the image of St. Luke, the sacrificial bull. But this looks just like a painting of bull fighting scenes (note the blood and guts coming out of the bulls) by Pablo Picasso, who we know was also a good friend of Graham's (see photo of Graham Sutherland and what looks like John Hutton visiting Picasso's studio). So is Picasso also on the list of the '1950s Mood board'?

Sutherland tapestry

Sutherland tapestry

 Sutherland and Pablo Picasso

The Crucified Christ at the bottom is very Graham Sutherland; very much like the Crucifixion that he did for St. Matthew's Church, Northampton, which Basel Spence had seen and liked and given him the idea to ask Graham to do the tapestry. What is interesting is the comparison between the cartoon and the finished tapestry. If you look at them both, at first you think the finished tapestry is a good representation of the cartoon. To do this they photographed the cartoon and did large black and white prints which Graham Sutherland went over giving fine tweaks; then he would go to the weaver's and do alterations to the design whilst they were weaving. Did he discretely alter the design without telling anyone? We know he visited Pinton Frères of Felletin, France, on nine occasions. Was it because it would not be seen until the tapestry was unrolled and then it would be too late to change.

Sutherland tapestry

Sutherland had focused his artwork on the inherent strangeness of natural forms, and abstracting them, sometimes giving his work a surrealist appearance. In 1936 he exhibited in the International Surrealist Exhibition in London. So he would have wanted to pay homage to the greatest surrealist, Salvador Dali. If you look at "The Madonna of Port Lligat" 1950 paintings you will see a similar setting. Note the cuffs and hands of the Madonna; but what is striking is the loaf in the centre of Christ. If you look at other paintings by Dali the main theme is eggs!

Surrealism

Artists love doing folds in cloth! It is one way of showing off. But Graham Sutherland has taken out the folds on Christ's knees in the Tapestry. Why?

Would Dan Brown make a link between the Old Cathedral, bombed, a symbol of Christ's suffering, which we commemorate on Good Friday, and the New Cathedral, a symbol of resurrection, and re-birth, which we commemorate on Easter Sunday. And does the egg play a big part?

Sutherland tapestry

The cartoon alongside the finished tapestry reveals some subtle differences, especially around Christ's knees.

Graham Sutherland never attended the unavailing of the tapestry or the consecration of the Cathedral in 1962. Was it because he did not want to hear criticism such as he received when Winston Churchill mocked his portrait of him? Or did he know that a large egg in the middle of the tapestry would not go down very well?

Did anyone notice? Or as in the tale of the Emperor's New clothes, do people only see what they want to see?

What other symbols would Dan Brown see? What twists and turns? What tales could he make up? Who else is being represented? Which artist's style is the eagle and lion in? Can you see any clues? Is there a Stanley Spencer reference? or John Piper, Max Ernst, Elizabeth Frink or John Hutton?

I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

Paul Maddocks

Reader Comments (0)

There are currently no comments on this article. Why not be the first and leave your thoughts below.

Leave Your Comment

Please keep your comment on topic, any inappropriate comments may be removed.

Return to index